Jump to content

Talk:De Havilland Canada DHC-3 Otter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

The description needs a bit of work. A Turbo-Otter is pictured, but no mention is made that several Otters have been retrofitted to use a Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-135A turboprop rather than the radial engine. Performance characteristics (hp, maximum speed, load, etc.) are different for the two models. Joe

Images

[edit]

Any chance that we can have a 'thin out'? I'm struggling to find the words in this article. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 23:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too many cooks, not enough broth! That was all casued by users inserting pics without paying attetnion to where they were. We even had a heading with a pic above and below it! I've stacked them in one place for the time being, but feel free to shuffle them around if needed. - BilCat (talk) 00:08, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I knew I would annoy someone by throwing in that black and white, and putting it where I did. One of the reasons for illustrations is to liven things up, and stacking is not terribly appealing visually (to me). But I defer to others, and the page looks good the way it is now. I had also rearranged the stacked photos to line them up better amongst themselves and with relevant text. I threw in the black and white only because the article mentions the U.S. Army as the owner of the largest number of Otters, and there wasn't a photo. I agree the biggest problem is lack of text, and noted the same problem re: the turbos. There are photos of them, but no explanation. De Havilland must have a fact sheet on the plane which could be used to flesh the article out. I would do it but I don't know enough (in fact, I know next to nothing about them) and don't have time for the research. Cheers! Sciacchitano (talk) 21:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The B&W photo itself was not a issue; the problem, as I said above, was placement. Perhaps white space was not a problem at the screen resolutions you use, but at lower resolutions it becomes a problem. Also, when pictures are separated by a small amout of text, or by a heading, it produces a large white space between them. Stacking may not look as pretty, but it avoids that issue. Of course, that all becomes less of a problem with more text. - BilCat (talk) 23:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Turbo Otters

[edit]

There are at least 3 different Turbo otters, two by Vazar that use the Pratt&Whitney PT6 engine (PT6A-135A and PT6A-34), two by Texas Turbine Conversions with a Garret TPE 331 engine (TPE 331-10 and TPE 331-12) and another using the Walter M601E-11 engine. I think that these should be listed under the "variants" column instead of the modifications section, also I don't know of a version of the DHC 3 that uses the PT6A-27 engine listed, however the DHC-6 Twin Otter uses this model of the PT6 engine.

manual

[edit]

would a scan of the flight manual be of any use for this wiki artical?

i have the one for cf-ukn http://www.flickr.com/photos/1ajs/4939322134/

1ajs (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on De Havilland Canada DHC-3 Otter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-3_Otter&oldid=1262641245"